Henry GALLANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the 23 claimant was entitled to benefits based on constant leg and back pain despite the claimant’s 24 ability to cook meals and wash dishes
• concluding that the 17 claimant was entitled to benefits based on constant leg and back pain despite the claimant’s 18 ability to cook meals and wash dishes
• concluding that the 4 claimant was entitled to benefits based on constant leg and back pain despite the claimant’s 5 ability to cook meals and wash dishes
• “The fact that a claimant does not exhibit physical manifestations of 4 prolonged pain at the hearing provides little, if any, support for the ALJ’s ultimate conclusion that 5 the claimant is not disabled or that his allegations of constant pain are not credible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).