Skip to main content
· 6/28/1990

Henry Benitez v. D. Wolff, J. Kihl

Citations

  • 907 F.2d 1293
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Sua sponte dismissal of a pro se complaint prior to service of process is a ‘draconian device’... which is warranted only when the complaint ‘lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.”’
  • “Sua sponte dismissal of a pro se complaint prior to service of process is a draconian device which is warranted only when the complaint lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact [or is] frivolous on its face or wholly insubstantial.” (citations omitted)
  • “Sua sponte dismissal of a pro se complaint prior to service of process is a draconian device which is warranted only when the complaint lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact [or is] frivolous on its face or wholly insubstantial.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Winter, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.