Henriquez v. Goord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no trade secret when “any secrecy in the design of the trap was lost when it was placed upon the market”
• finding no trade secret when “any secrecy in the design of the trap was lost when it was placed upon the market”
• finding no trade secret where “any secrecy in the design of the [product] was lost when it was placed upon the market”
• price discount, product use, and preference information constituted trade secrets under New York law
• trap and filter device used in the cable television industry is not a trade secret because, inter alia, any secrecy in its design “was lost when it was placed upon the market”
• trap and filter device used in the cable television industry is not a trade secret because, inter alia, any secrecy in its design “was lost when it was placed upon the market”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).