Skip to main content
· 4/10/1976

Henrickson v. Drotts

Citations

  • 548 P.2d 465
  • 219 Kan. 435
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • action by grain dealer to recover balance due on open account from defendant, a farmer and long-time customer
  • requirements of K.S.A. 60-252 and Supreme Court Rule 116 [now 165] “may not be waived by the district court or by the parties to tire action”
  • “A court should be cautious in granting a motion for summary judgment when resolution of the dis-positive issue necessitates a determination of the state of mind of one or both of the parties.”
  • “A court should be cautious in granting a motion for summary judgment when resolution of the dispositive issue necessitates a determination of the state of mind of one or both of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaul, Fbomme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.