Henning v. Henning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a license was revocable because there was “no evidence . . . that the [licensee] changed its position with respect to the premises, or expended any moneys in excess of ordinary maintenance and repairs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).