Hennig v. Ahearn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an attorney whose practice focused on business should not be precluded from testimony regarding the practice of business executives merely because he was not a business executive
• concluding that an attorney whose practice focused on business should not be precluded from testimony regarding the practice of business executives merely because he was not a business executive
• holding that a party to a contract had assumed t he duty to disclose last minute changes
• denying summary judgment on a fraudulent misrepresentation claim for failure to disclose a last-minute alteration during the negotiation of an executive compensation agreément because there was evidence from which a jury could determine the existénee of a duty
• \[T]he general rule is that a party who signs a contract after a fair opportunity to read the contract is bound by its terms.\
• \A misrepresentation of fact and justifiable reliance thereon are elements common to all three types of misrepresentation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).