HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Congress enacted these provisions in response to the policy proposals of the Office of the Inspector General of HHS
• statutes and their legislative history were \sufficiently clear to support the conclusion that there is no `gap' to be filled by the Secretary's interpretation.\
• “Congress was motivated to prevent unexpected consequences to providers from the inspector general’s proposed changes in the criteria for bad debt reimbursement.”
• statutes and their legislative history were “sufficiently clear to support the conclusion that there is no ‘gap’ to be filled by the Secretary’s interpretation.”
• “In passing the moratorium, Congress was motivated to prevent unexpected consequences to providers from the [I]nspector [G]Jeneral’s proposed changes in the criteria for bad debt reimbursement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).