Henne v. Balick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a witness’s or counsel’s suggestion regarding a reasonable award for pain and suffering is inappropriate
• finding that the amount for “pain and suffering shall be determined by the trier of facts based upon the evidence submitted” and not by a per diem calculation that is “merely a speculation of counsel . . . unsupported by the evidence”
• discussing the proof necessary for a “future consequence of a tortious injury”
• “The law does not permit a recovery of damages which is merely speculative or conjectural.”
• “The burden is upon the plaintiff to furnish [] proof [of damages]. If he fails in this respect, the [court] cannot supply the omission by speculation or conjecture.”
• “The burden is upon the plaintiff to furnish [] proof [of damages]. If he fails in this respect, the [court] cannot supply the omission by speculation or conjecture.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).