Hennagir v. Utah Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim of causation based solely on temporal proximity alone when “months separated the alleged protected activity and adverse action” (quotations omitted)
• listing job functions that might be needed only infrequently but could be deemed essential nonetheless
• identifying job description as factor to consider but doing so in context of ADA claim
• analyzing multiple factors to determine whether a certification was an essential job function
• “To establish causation in an ADA retaliation action, however, a plaintiff must also demonstrate that the individual who engaged in a materially adverse action knew about the protected activity.”
• “At the summary judgment stage, the relevant inquiry in determining whether Plaintiff is qualified is whether he has provided evidence that she can be reasonably accommodated . . . .” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).