Henley v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]hether the full amount of the judgment was recoverable was a jury question that depended upon what damages were found to flow from the breach of the contractual duty to defend.\
• \[W]hether the full amount of the judgment was recoverable was a jury question that depended upon what damages were found to flow from the breach of the contractual duty to defend.\
• \[W]hether the full amount of the judgment was recoverable was a jury question that depended upon what damages were found to flow from the breach of the contractual duty to defend.\
• “[W]hether the full amount of the judgment was 26 27 5Plaintiffs continue to argue that Nautilus’s duty to defend was triggered even 28 earlier on September 23, 2016. (ECF No. 419 at 89.) The Court does not consider these 2 from the breach of the contractual duty to defend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).