Henley v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that both Ratliff and Edmonds found EED instructions necessary due to testimony about defendants’ respective mental illnesses
• stating that both Ratliff and Edmonds found EED instructions necessary due to testimony about defendants' respective mental illnesses
• “The' absence of ‘extreme emotional disturbance’ is an essential element of the offense of murder, and the legislature intended the Commonwealth to bear the risk of nonpersuasion on this element of mitigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).