Hendrix v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• physicians testified that administration of laxative to individual who had swallowed a large baggie of cocaine was \absolutely necessary\
• physicians testified that administration of laxative to individual who had swallowed a large baggie of cocaine was \absolutely necessary\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Rochin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
• Winston v. Lee
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 733×
• Malinski v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 711×
• Terry v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-01-04· cited 247×
• Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-10· cited 147×
• In Re Guardianship of Browning
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-13· cited 77×
• Lewis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-08-14· cited 52×
• State v. Strong
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-12-23· cited 50×
• United States v. Ira Eugene Borchardt
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-02-03· cited 36×
• State v. Hume
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-10· cited 31×
• L.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-17· cited 31×
• United States v. George Steven Mayes
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-02-24· cited 16×
• Gilbert v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-02-12· cited 16×
• United States v. Pedro Ernesto McGregor
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-09-13· cited 15×
• Oviedo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-02-28· cited 11×
• State v. Hutchins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-06· cited 7×
• State v. Jimeno
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-10-24· cited 6×