Skip to main content

Hendricks v. State

Citations

  • 79 Miss. 368

Syllabus

<p>1. Statutoey CONSTRUCTION. Penal statute. Code 1893, \\ 1068. Laws ' 1900, p. 140.</p> <p>Penal statutes are to be strictly construed, and a laborer who has contracted in writing to labor in making a crop on shares for another, but has never entered upon the service or gone upon the employer’s premises, cannot be convicted for leaving his employer or abandoning- his premises, under code 1893, 1068, amended Laws 1900, p. 140, making it a misdemeanor for any laborer, renter or “share-cropper,” who has contracted in writing to labor for another, to leave his employer or the leased premises before the expiration of his contract.</p> <p>3. Constitutional Law. Statutes. Courts.</p> <p>The courts should not decide the constitutionality of a statute unless it be necessary to the disposition of a cause.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Court is “constrained by our sense of duty to deny” a request to decide a constitutional question that is unnecessary to the resolution of the litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calhook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.