Hendricks v. Smartvideo Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Questions of reliance on an alleged fraudulent misrepresentation must be determined as a question of fact for the jury.” (alteration adopted; citations and quotation marks omitted)
• “In diversity cases, the Court applies the substantive law of the forum”
• “[T]he agreement was reached, and thus made, in Georgia. . . . Hendricks bases his promissory estoppel and specific performance claims on the same factual basis as the contract claim. As such, the promissory estoppel and specific performance claims are governed by Georgia law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).