Skip to main content
· 9/9/1992

Hendgen v. Clackamas County

Citations

  • 836 P.2d 1369
  • 115 Or. App. 117
  • 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no change in nonconforming use status despite rental of storage buildings to a different business storing different items because “[t]he common nucleus of both activities [is] storage”
  • holding no change in nonconforming use status despite rental of storage buildings to a different business storing different items because \[t]he common nucleus of both activities [is] storage\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, P.J., and Deits and Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.