Skip to main content
· 9/30/2013

Henderson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Citations

  • 974 F. Supp. 2d 993
  • 2013 WL 5433498
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the word \fondle\ is sufficiently clear and noting that \[r]egulatory language need not be mathematically precise\
  • holding that word “fondle” is sufficiently clear and noting that “[rjegulatory language need not be mathematically precise”
  • holding that the word “fondle” is sufficiently clear and noting that “[rjegulatory language need not be mathematically precise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindsay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.