Skip to main content
· 6/5/1989

Henderson v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

Citations

  • 736 F. Supp. 100
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16759
  • 1989 WL 205617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that scienter was properly alleged where the company’s external auditor’s resignation cited the lack of “tangible progress” on corporate governance issues he had previously raised
  • noting that truth of a short seller’s report is a factual issue not appropriate for resolution on a motion to dismiss
  • finding that plaintiffs had pled a number of “red flags” that raised finding of corporate scienter where plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that investigators had visited defendants’ facilities and found no employees working there
  • dismissing Section 20(a) claim where plaintiffs “plead[ed] only general and conclusory allegations” against corporate entities, “failing to set forth particularized facts establishing their culpable participation in [the] alleged fraud”
  • finding allegation that defendant had reported “drastically different income and revenue figures with the [Securities and Exchange Committee] and the [Chinese Administration of Industry and Commerce]” sufficient to allege corporate scienter
  • considering a short seller report in denying defendant company’s motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.