Henderson v. TANDEM HEALTH CARE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding rendition of new order requiring rescheduling and active participation in arbitration was not appealable as order determining entitlement to arbitration, which had been determined in earlier order that was not appealed
• dismissing appeal of nonfinal order where previous order rather than order on appeal had determined entitlement to arbitration
• dismissing appeal because order requiring parties to reschedule arbitration did not determine entitlement to arbitration, which was made in earlier referral order, “and the trial court was not required to make this finding anew”
• dismissing appeal because order requiring parties to reschedule arbitration did not determine entitlement to arbitration, which was made in earlier referral order, “and the trial court was not required to make this finding anew”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).