Court of Appeals of Texas· 5/23/2002
Henderson v. State
Citations
- 77 S.W.3d 321
- 2002 WL 362505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testifying whether blow to child’s head was accidental
- testifying whether blow to child’s head was accidental
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day, Dauphinot, Richards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coastal Tankships, U.S.A., Inc. v. AndersonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-08· cited 99×
- Wiggs v. All Saints Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-12-31· cited 21×
- Powell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-06-26· cited 19×
- Gokey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-03-03· cited 11×
- Steve Robert Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-18· cited 7×
- Vallado v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-06-22· cited 6×
- Willover, Craig Jonathan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-08
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-12-31
- Roland Richard Green v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-07-24
- in the Interest of R.H.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-11-16
- John Stewart Delong v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-11-16
- Jose Luis Calvo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-05-04
- David Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-08-14
- Hannah Ruth Overton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-10-29
- Alfredo Juan Tobar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-07-16
- Michael League v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-10-12
- Rudy L. Vallado v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-06-22
- Jose Hechavarria Valdez A/K/A Jose Echavarria Valdez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-04-07
- Robert Wade Gokey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-03-03
- Larry Dale King v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2024-03-21
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-08· cited 1,699×
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-22· cited 1,412×
- Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1998-07-03· cited 855×
- Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court· 1996-06-14· cited 767×
- Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-12-06· cited 697×
- Nenno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-06-24· cited 479×
- State v. TerrazasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-09-15· cited 424×
- United States v. Kathleen Kremser JonesSixth Circuit· 1997-03-03· cited 184×
- Adams v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1997-10-06· cited 142×
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 123×
- Pack v. Crossroads, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-09-20· cited 97×
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,032 Daniel Freeman, and Mary Freeman v. Case Corporation, A/K/A J.I. Case Company, a Tenneco Corporation Case InternationalFourth Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 65×
- Chandler v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-20· cited 49×
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-04-16· cited 22×
- United States v. Martha Molina Sanchez Carvalho, United States of America v. Fernando Leal CarvalhoFourth Circuit· 1984-08-23· cited 17×
- Yard v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-05-03· cited 15×
- Unisys Corp. v. Ceska Sporitelna, A. S.Supreme Court· 1998-01-12· cited 15×
- In Re Marriage of TullierMissouri Court of Appeals· 1999-03-17· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.