Skip to main content

Henderson v. State

Citations

  • 306 S.E.2d 645
  • 251 Ga. 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prohibiting question about whether a juror’s family had ever worked for law enforcement was not harmless error when critical witnesses to prove the State’s case against defendant were law enforcement personnel.
  • prohibiting question about whether a juror's family had ever worked for law enforcement was not harmless error when critical witnesses to prove the State's case against defendant were law enforcement personnel.
  • “Questions seeking to test the prospective jurors’ willingness to accept defenses have been disallowed and upheld on appeal.”
  • \[q]uestions seeking to test the prospective jurors' willingness to accept defenses have been disallowed and upheld on appeal\
  • “the larger purpose” of voir dire “is to enable counsel to identify those prospective jurors counsel desires to remove from the panel by use of peremptory strikes as opposed to challenges for cause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.