Skip to main content
· 8/26/1748

Henderson v. Sloop Kingston

Citations

  • 1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • informant’s testimony admissible because reward was not dependent upon making a case against particular persons specified in advance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Esqr, Honble

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.