Skip to main content
· 8/21/1985

Henderson v. Millis

Citations

  • 373 N.W.2d 497
  • 1985 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, given language in the agreement, a ROFR could not be exercised in context of a foreclosure sale
  • holding given language in agreement, right of first refusal could not be exercised in context of a foreclosure sale
  • Given language in agreement, right of first refusal could not be exercised in context of foreclosure sale
  • “Laches consists of unreasonable delay in asserting rights which causes another undue prejudice, proven by clear and convincing evidence. Mere passage of time is not enough . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Uhlenhopp, Harris, McGiverin, Schultz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.