Henderson v. Harrah's Marina Hotel Casino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that individualized claims and defenses on statute of limitations issue can be adjudicated in separate determinations of damages
• agreement with \authority which holds that the common questions with regard to fraudulent concealment predominate over individual questions of knowledge and due diligence.\
• “Since private enforcement of antitrust laws provides a supplement to governmental enforcement, it is our view that class action treatment of alleged antitrust violations is appropriate and desirable.”
• “[T]he impracticability of joinder is best seen by noting the difficulties involved in having thirty-five intervenors, all 20 with their respective attorneys, attempt to go through the formal motions required for entrance into and participation in the suit” (cleaned up)
• certifying class with a total of 36 potential members
• common questions pervade fraudulent concealment inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).