Henderson v. City of Detroit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that allowing a party to reopen its case and present further evidence after it has rested is generally within the discretion of the trial court
• “Whether a party shall be permitted to reopen his case and present further evidence after he has rested, is generally within the discretion of the trial court_”
• “Whether a party shall be permitted to reopen his case * * * after he has rested, is generally within the discretion of the trial court * * In Jouppis, we held that it was an abuse of discretion to deny the defendant’s request to reopen the case because (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).