Skip to main content
· 12/8/1989

Henderson v. Charles E. Smith Management, Inc.

Citations

  • 567 A.2d 59
  • 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 253
  • 1989 WL 147618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the extent to which the element of control exists can be shown by the terms of the contract between the parties
  • noting that both factors—consent and control—must exist for a principal-agent relationship to exist
  • court “must look for evidence that the activities of the agent are subject to the principal’s control” (emphasis in original)
  • “The existence of an agency relationship is a question of fact, for which the person asserting the relationship has the burden of proof.”
  • agency relationship exists where “„one person authorizes another to act on his [or her] behalf subject to his [or her] control, and the other consents to do so.‟”
  • agency relationship exists where ‘“one person authorizes another to act on his [or her] behalf subject to his [or her] control, and the other consents to do so.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Belson and Schwelb, Associate Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.