Hempkin v. Bowmar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that higher rates are justified because “the relevant legal community [for prosecuting ERISA class action cases] is national in scope”
• applying a 10% across-the-board fee cut to account for duplicative efforts by multiple firms
• approving a service award of $10,000 to one named plaintiff
• approving award of $10,000 to a named plaintiff
• collecting cases approving $10,000 incentive awards
• ten percent reduction for duplication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).