· 3/21/2008
Hemphill v. Estate of Ryskamp
Citations
- 619 F. Supp. 2d 954
- 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1530
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22528
- 2008 WL 789894
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting, in a 2008 opinion that “Plaintiff has been attempting since 1994 to obtain plan documents and information”
- relying on Romero v. SmithKline Beecham, 809 F.3d 113, 120 (3rd Cir.2002), modified sub nom. Hemphill v. Pers. Rep. of Estate of Ryskamp, No. CVF-05-1319 OWW/SMS, 2008 WL 1696722 (E.D.Cal. Apr. 8, 2008)
- claims against executor were not barred by California Probate Code provision that was preempted by ERISA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oliver W. Wanger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.