Hemmings v. Gorczyk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to dismiss case despite fact that plaintiff did receive some medical treatment
• “Hemmings has alleged facts that could potentially show, upon further development, that his” injury involving a ruptured achilles tendon “was sufficiently painful to satisfy the objective prong of the deliberate indifference test under the Eighth Amendment.”
• claim that symptoms of severe injury were easily observable and “classic” sufficient to survive motion to dismiss on subjective prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).