Hemmerle v. Schriro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the statute of limitations runs when the || time to seek review of a decision expires
• holding the proceeding 23 ended when the Arizona Supreme Court denied review following the Arizona Court of 24 Appeals’ denial of review
• holding in Arizona, a direct appeal is final upon the expiration of the time 13 for seeking review of the court of appeals’ decision in the Arizona Supreme Court
• instructing that the statute of limitations for a federal 8 habeas petition begins running on the date from which the state supreme court denies a 9 petition for review of a denial of post-conviction relief
• rejecting argument that “final” means the date on which a state 18 appellate court issues a remittitur or mandate and holding that finality means the last 19 20 4 Through its subparts (A) through (D), Section 2244(d)(1
• “all operative facts to an ineffective assistance claim must 13 be presented to the state courts in order for a petitioner to exhaust his remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).