Hemmendinger v. McGann Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that “[t]estimony about the significance of certain transactions and their conformance (or lack of conformance) with prudent and customary practices of corporate governance is permissible”
• “Likewise, the ‘opinion’ . . . that Miller Detroit operated as an alter ego of Miller Chicago will be excluded as an improper legal conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).