Supreme Court of Vermont· 10/13/1989
Hemingway v. Shatney
Citations
- 568 A.2d 394
- 152 Vt. 600
- 1989 Vt. LEXIS 205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Vermont is “notice” state and timing of recording affects only rights of subsequent purchaser “without actual or inquiry notice”
- subsequent purchaser with notice of prior contract takes subject to first purchaser=s equity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Springer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bookstaver v. Town of WestminsterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1973-02-06· cited 40×
- Potwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1967-06-06· cited 20×
- Troy v. HanifinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1974-02-04· cited 12×
- Moore v. CenterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1964-10-06· cited 11×
- West-Nesbitt, Inc. v. Ralston Purina CompanySupreme Court of Vermont· 1970-06-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.