Skip to main content
· 7/1/1863

Hemenway v. Cutler

Citations

  • 51 Me. 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding no evidence that Goss’s involuntarily hospitalization by defendant probably would have prevented her 17 suicide
  • permitting action against psychiatrist for failure to prevent suicide where “suicide probably would not have occurred if the decedent had been hospitalized.”
  • noting that foreseeability is one component of proximate causation
  • providing that for a negligent act or omission to have been a cause-in-fact of the harm, the act or omission must have been a substantial factor in bringing about the harm, and absent the act or omission—i.e., but 19 for the act or omission—the harm would not have occurred
  • “Proximate cause has two components: (1) foreseeability and (2) cause-in-fact.”
  • “For a negligent act or omission to have been a cause-in-fact of the harm, the act or omission must have been a substantial factor in bringing about the harm, and absent the act or omission—i.e., but for the act or omission—the harm would not have occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Cutting, Davis, Dickerson, Kent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.