Hemberger v. Hagemann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding an attorney violated the precursor to rule 32:1.15(b) when he “used his trust account for the deposit of earned fees”
• concluding an attorney violated the precursor to rule 32:1.15(b) when he “used his trust account for the deposit of earned fees”
• finding violation of Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers DR 9-102(A), the forerunner to rule 32:1.15(a
• finding violation of Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers DR 9–102(A), the forerunner to rule 32:1.15(a
• “The commission was also correct in refusing to give consideration to the motive of [the attorney]’s former secretary in alerting the board to [the attorneyjs misconduct.”
• “The commission was also correct in refusing to give consideration to the motive of [the attorney]’s former secretary in alerting the board to [the attorney]’s misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).