Hem v. Maurer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a showing of “objective reliance,” i.e., that reliance would have been reasonable under the circum- stances
• rejecting Rankine’s actual reliance requirement in favor of an objective reliance standard
• \ Hughes Aircraft . . . similarly failed to impose any reliance requirement on retroactivity challenges.\
• \The facts of Landgraf itself belie any notion that the Supreme Court requires a showing of actual reliance as a prerequisite to sustain a retroactivity challenge.\
• retroactive application of provision of IIRIRA was impermissible in case of alien who proceeded to trial rather than pleading guilty
• “Hughes Aircraft ... similarly failed to impose any reliance requirement on retroactivity challenges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).