Helwig v. Cavell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the proper way to challenge agency’s decision to withhold testimony was a direct action pursuant to APA
• “it is within the district court’s discretion, once the basis for removal 25 jurisdiction is dropped, whether to hear the rest of the action or remand it to the state court from 26 which it was removed”
• “at is within 2 || the district court’s discretion, once the basis for removal jurisdiction is dropped, whether to hear 3 || the rest of the action or remand it to the state court from which it was removed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).