Helvering v. Supplee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that what is now section 26.5-2 was “neither vague nor overbroad”
• finding no overbreadth in statute requiring proof of intent to abuse, threaten or harass

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).