Helvering v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff “advanced a colorable claim that the defendants willfully disregarded his condition, which was easily observable” and about which a “specialist . . . expressed shock at the . . . failure to . . . treat the injury” (footnote omitted)
• sua sponte dismissal improper since plaintiff “advanced at least a colorable claim warranting further development of the facts”
• ruptured Achilles tendon 17 constitutes a serious medical need

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).