Helton v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that claim preclusion did not bar defendant’s counterclaim, notwithstanding prior arbitration between the parties, when counterclaims were “not based on the same fac- tual transaction that was at issue in the prior arbitration” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• determining that claim preclusion did not bar defendant’s counterclaim, notwithstanding prior arbitration between the parties, when counterclaims were “not based on the same fac- tual transaction that was at issue in the prior arbitration” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing claims that are not based on the same factual transactions
• claim preclusion not a bar to contract action where prior arbitration did not involve and actually resolve the issue to be decided in the contract action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).