Skip to main content
· 11/4/1999

Helm v. Washington

Citations

  • 720 N.E.2d 326
  • 308 Ill. App. 3d 255
  • 241 Ill. Dec. 871
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an inmate's petition that sought a grant of sentencing credit was not appropriate for habeas corpus relief
  • inmate's mandamus petition properly dismissed because decision to award meritorious good-conduct credit to qualifying prisoners is discretionary
  • inmate’s mandamus petition properly dismissed because decision to award meritorious good-conduct credit to qualifying prisoners is discretionary
  • “Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that may be used only to compel a public official or body to perform a ministerial duty in which the official exercises no discretion”
  • \Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that may be used only to compel a public official or body to perform a ministerial duty in which the official exercises no discretion\
  • inmate's mandamus petition properly dismissed because decision to award meritorious good-conduct credit to qualifying prisoners is discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breslin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.