· 11/4/1999
Helm v. Washington
Citations
- 720 N.E.2d 326
- 308 Ill. App. 3d 255
- 241 Ill. Dec. 871
- 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 771
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an inmate's petition that sought a grant of sentencing credit was not appropriate for habeas corpus relief
- inmate's mandamus petition properly dismissed because decision to award meritorious good-conduct credit to qualifying prisoners is discretionary
- inmate’s mandamus petition properly dismissed because decision to award meritorious good-conduct credit to qualifying prisoners is discretionary
- “Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that may be used only to compel a public official or body to perform a ministerial duty in which the official exercises no discretion”
- \Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that may be used only to compel a public official or body to perform a ministerial duty in which the official exercises no discretion\
- inmate's mandamus petition properly dismissed because decision to award meritorious good-conduct credit to qualifying prisoners is discretionary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breslin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.