Helm v. Helm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Failure to so request findings would have the effect of precluding any claim challenging the adequacy of the findings.”
• in absence of findings, question becomes whether or not, viewing evidence in light most favorable to prevailing party, there is support in the evidence for the decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maurer v. Maurer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-02-22· cited 31×
• Slade v. Slade
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-03-23· cited 12×
• Parker v. Parker
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-03-15· cited 8×
• Leonard v. Leonard
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-07-15· cited 2×
• Paquette v. Paquette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-10-02· cited 1×