Helluin v. Maurin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the likelihood of public disclosure was “quite low” where the committee’s rules “require[d] subpoenaed materials . . . to be kept confi- dential” and there was insufficient “evidence to suggest” that the committee would not “follow its own rules”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).