Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to the agency's interpretation because the plain language of the regulation \is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation\
• considering whether an EIS for a recreation man- OREGON NATURAL DESERT v. BLM 8583 Here, the BLM is charged with “manag[ing] the public lands under principles of multiple use and sustained yield,” 43 U.S.C. § 1732(a
• applying the “common meaning” of terms not defined in the statute
• “the mere existence of some decline in scenic value does not establish that motorized use substantially interferes with this value”
• the agency’s “decisions with respect to what uses are inconsistent with protection and enhancement and ‘substantially interfere’ with the river corridor’s values must be accorded substantial deference[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).