Hellrung v. Hellrung

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the ALJ’s determination that the plaintiff’s Meniere’s disease did not meet the listings but nevertheless finding that the ALJ erred in his assessment that the plaintiff’s allegations of disabling dizziness were not credible
• “Even if the ALJ did not err in discounting plaintiff’s claim of disabling dizziness, the ALJ erred in failing to consider the combined effects of his impairments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).