Heller Financial v. Insurance Co. of North America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that while a Chapter 93A plaintiff “need not show actual reliance on the misrepresentation, the evidence must warrant a finding that a causal relationship existed between the misrepresentation and the injury”
• explaining that while a Chapter 93A plaintiff “need not show actual reliance on the misrepresentation, the evidence must warrant a finding that a causal relationship existed between the misrepresentation and the injury”
• “[W]hile Heller need not show actual reliance on the misrepresentation, the evidence must warrant a finding that a causal relationship existed between the misrepresentation and the injury.”
• “[T]he evidence must warrant a finding that a causal relationship existed between the misrepresentation and the injury.”
• plaintiff must show “a causal relationship existed between the misrepresentation and the injury.”
• a misrepresentation is sufficient to support a 93A § 11 claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).