Helfstein v. Merovitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that HIPAA does not “confer[] privacy rights” and that courts are “in agreement that [HIPAA] does not support a private right of action”
• finding that “plaintiff has at most pleaded facts ‘consistent with’ an improper disclosure, but that ‘stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of entitlement to relief’ under the Privacy Act.”
• finding that plaintiff’s pro se complaint has “at most pleaded facts ‘consistent with’ an improper disclosure, but that ‘stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of entitlement to relief’ under the Privacy Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).