Helfrich v. Solo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the patentee sought, “[i]n addition to . . . an accounting for the infringement,” treble damages based on “the wanton and aggravated character of the infringement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-06-14· cited 71×
• Research Products Co. v. Tretolite Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1939-09-07· cited 28×
• National Theatre Supply Co. v. Da-Lite Screen Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1936-11-27· cited 5×
• Austenal Laboratories, Inc. v. Nobilium Processing Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 1957-06-05· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• White v. Dunbar
  Supreme Court· 1886-11-15· cited 270×
• Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1931-11-23· cited 174×
• Brady Brass Co. v. Ajax Metal Co.
  Third Circuit· 1908-02-21· cited 23×
• Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Saranac Lake Electric Light Co.
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York· 1901-04-27· cited 20×
• Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Churchward International Steel Co.
  Third Circuit· 1920-09-28· cited 20×
• Brown v. Stilwell & Bierce Manuf'g Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1893-02-07· cited 16×
• Bituminous Products Co. v. Headley Good Roads Co.
  D. Delaware· 1924-10-16· cited 11×
• Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. Texas Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 1929-03-06· cited 10×