Helen Debreceni, Etc. v. Merchants Terminal Corporation and Terminal Refrigeration and Warehousing Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “if any equitable exception exists, it would be limited to certain very specific circumstances that are entirely absent here.”
• explaining that plaintiff must first “‘identify and relate specific instances where persons situated similarly ‘in all relevant aspects’ were treated differently’” (quotation omitted)
• to prove equal protection violation, plaintiff must identify “instances which have the capacity to demonstrate that [the plaintiff was] singled . . . out for unlawful oppression”
• “The purpose of [Rule 8 41(a)(2)] is to permit a plaintiff to dismiss an action without prejudice so long as the 9 defendant will not be prejudiced or unfairly affected by the dismissal.”
• failure to state a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).