· 11/3/1999
Helbling v. Williams (In Re Williams)
Citations
- 240 B.R. 884
- 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1374
- 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 37
- 1999 WL 1005180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Paramount’s per se rule only applies to cases in which the mortgagor’s testimony is rebutted by a certificate of acknowledgement
- holding thatParamount's per se rule only applies to cases in which the mortgagor's testimony is rebutted by a certificate of acknowledgement
- recognizing that “every opinion in which [O.R.C. § 5301.234]has been considered” has found that statute should be applied prospectively only
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David F. Snow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.