Heivly v. Miller
Citations
- 102 Kan. 313
- 169 P. 1141
- 1918 Kan. LEXIS 36
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS iBY THE COURT.</p> <p>Divorce — Decree—Property Rights Determined — Res Judicata. Following the rule stated in Roe v. Roe, 52 Kan. 724, 35 Pac. 808, it is held that a judgment in a divorce action, making a division of property and reciting that it was a final and full adjustment of all property rights and claims between the parties, is a bar to a recovery upon an allowance previously made by the probate court to the wife against the estate of the husband for expenses that were incurred and paid while the marriage relation existed and while she was guardian of his person and estate, and before the divorce was granted.</p>
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.