Heitmeyer v. Sasser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an expert’s affidavit was conelusory because it did not provide any reasoning to support the expert’s conclusions
• determining that affidavits containing general statements framed in terms of conclusions of law are insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).